While I was growing up in an Australia of peace and prosperity, the
nation of Chile was undergoing a very different time. We'll start back
in 1970 when Salvador Allende became the world's first (and only?)
democratically elected socialist president. He quickly introduced a
number of extreme, and controversial, left-wing measures - the
nationalisation of major industries, the redistribution of land, raising
of the minimum wage and increased social spending. By 1972 inflation
had soared, basic commodities were no longer freely available, the
government announced its intention to default on international debts -
and the international price for copper (Chile's most important export)
had plummeted.1 The resulting unrest climaxed on September 11 1973 when
the right-wing army commander, Augusto Pinochet, toppled the government
in a violent coup (during which Allende killed himself).
Pinochet
was in power for nearly 17 years. During this time at least 3200 people
were murdered or disappeared and 27 000 tortured. The 2003 National
Commission on Political Imprisonment and
Torture found that two thirds of tortures happened in the three months
following the coup and that the victims were largely innocent
civilians. "The physical
trauma had taken a heavy psychological toll on many torture victims,
leaving them humilitated, depressed and often unable to keep a job or
sustain close relationships."2
Today, people's perception of Pinochet's regime varies
enormously. An author writing about a town with the highest recorded
number of disappearances/killings tells of, "A hairdresser whose father had disappeared when she was two
years old [who] said her earliest memory was of her mother leaving her and
her siblings home alone to search for him. At the salon where she
works, many of the customers are still very vocal about their
admiration for Pinochet."3 And in the same town, "A teacher at the local high school told me most of his
students had no idea about what had happened in their town in wake of
the 1973 military coup, though occasionally some ask him about life
during the regime."4 The director of a Chilean polling organisation also observed that, although Santiago remains Latin America's safest capital, "fear of crime in present-day Chile [is] higher than fear of the
military had been under Pinochet. 'If you kept your head down you
could avoid trouble with the military.'"5
During
Pinochet's reign, some structures of civil society were abolished
(congress, the presidency, freedom of speech) or used to serve
Pinochet's ends (the media, the judiciary - which retained its powers
yet failed to take any action in regard to human rights abuses).
Yet despite this, Pinochet did operate within the boundaries prescribed
by his 1980 constitution. Indeed, his reign ended peacefully after a
1988 nationwide plebisite on whether his presidency should continue for another eight-year term. Pinochet's opponents formed a
sixteen-party Comando del No coalition which began by urging
people to sign onto the electoral roll (the earlier version of which was
destroyed in the coup). Over 90% of Chileans obliged. Pinochet also permitted various measures which ensured a fair voting process. And, unlike
the previous (corrupt) plebisites, the "no" vote won the day. Initially,
Pinochet threatened privately to maintain his rule by force, but he
later allowed elections to take place and handed over power to a new,
left-wing president.
This mixture of autocracy and
democracy is intriguing enough, but the complex situation continued.
Despite losing the presidency, Pinochet remained army commander for the
next ten years. This meant that "democratic leaders had
to engage in an elaborate and prolonged bargaining process with the
former dictator and his supporters . . . . Though it was never clear
whether the army's officer corps and soldiers would support another
coup, Pinochet often implied he might take such a course if the
situation warranted."6 During this time he also "managed to dodge a series of judicial
investigations into some of the worst crimes of his regimes as well
as an inquiry into an illicit fortune he had built up during his rule
and hidden in bank accounts abroad."7 Pinochet died in Chile in 2006, during the government of Michelle Bachelet, the fourth democratically elected president since his regime.
1 Above information obtained from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Allende
2 MH Spooner, The General's Slow Retreat: Chile After Pinochet (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011), 193. All unacknowledged information is from this source.
3 Ibid, 8.
4 Ibid, 7.
5 Ibid, 5.
6 Ibid, 3.
7 Ibid, 3.
2 comentarios:
Hey Fi, I've been meaning to ask you for ages, do you know of a good book that gives a general overview of Chilean history and/or a picture of contemporary Chilean life? Or anything interesting that you've read that you feel gave you some insight into Chile?
'fraid not. There's a book on Chile I'm supposed to read (Popular Culture in Chile: Resistance and Survival by K Aman), but after disliking another book on the reading list I lost heart, so I can't tell you what it's like. I reckon you'd love the book this post's based on though.
Hey this website looks great: http://www.thisischile.cl/About-Chile.aspx?idioma=2&eje=acerca
Post a Comment